Comparing the code of std::map::find and std::map::count, I'd say the first may yield some performance advantage:
const_iterator find(const key_type& _Keyval) const { // find an element in nonmutable sequence that matches _Keyval const_iterator _Where = lower_bound(_Keyval); // Here one looks only for lower bound return (_Where == end() || _DEBUG_LT_PRED(this->_Getcomp(), _Keyval, this->_Key(_Where._Mynode())) ? end() : _Where); }size_type count(const key_type& _Keyval) const { // count all elements that match _Keyval _Paircc _Ans = equal_range(_Keyval); // Here both lower and upper bounds are to be found, which is presumably slower. size_type _Num = 0; _Distance(_Ans.first, _Ans.second, _Num); return (_Num); }